logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2016.12.13 2016고단3413
산업안전보건법위반
Text

Defendants shall be punished by each fine of KRW 3,000,000.

Defendant

If A fails to pay the above fine, it shall be prohibited.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The defendants' identity as the representative director of the corporation B, who is responsible for the overall business of safety and health management for the employees of the corporation, and the defendant corporation B is the business owner who carries out the business of producing siren additives and materials in Category C.

2. Defendant A

A. Notwithstanding the fact that a business owner violating Article 87(1) of the Rules on Standards for Occupational Safety and Health must install a cover, slick, slick, slick, slick, and slick, etc. on the parts where workers are likely to face danger, such as motors, power slick, flick, lick, lick, and chain, the Defendant did not install a cover, etc. on July 28, 2016 and August 1, 2016, even if the reaction (GL-04) installed in the place of business at the place of business at the above address is likely to compromise workers.

B. Although a business owner violating Article 261(1) of the Rules on Industrial Safety and Health should install a safety valve or wave plate equipped with the performance and standard for explosion prevention in order to prevent explosion due to excessive pressure with respect to pressure vessels (excluding pressure vessels the diameter of which does not exceed 150 millimeters), the Defendant did not install a pressure prevention valve or wave plate in a DNA canter (D-41) corresponding to the pressure vessel, which is at least 150 meters in diameter connected to the reaction machine (GL-04) at the time and place stated in the above paragraph.

C. The business owner violating Article 269(1) of the Regulations on Standards for Industrial Safety and Health discharges steam or gas into the atmosphere from chemical facilities storing inflammable liquid or inflammable gas, despite that, in the case of releasing steam or gas into the atmosphere, the chemical equipment should be installed at the top of the equipment in order to prevent chemical infection from outside. However, the Defendant did not install a flame prevention device at the upper part of the storage tank, at the time and at the place specified in the above paragraph (a).

Article 270(1)3 of the Regulations on Standards for Occupational Safety and Health.

arrow