logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.07.24 2017나76809
부당이득금
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of this court’s judgment citing the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows: (a) the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is identical to that of the judgment of the court of first instance except for dismissal or dismissal as set forth in the following (2).

2. On September 2, 201, part of the judgment of the court of first instance, which was dismissed or rewritten, “Around September 5, 201” shall be deemed to be “Around September 2, 201.”

Part 3, 17, and 18 of the judgment of the first instance court are as follows: “The portion of the case occupied was restored to its original state.”

No. 6 of the judgment of the first instance court, " alone with the statement of the judgment (Evidence 6 of the judgment)" was written by adding "A" to "each statement or image of the evidence (including paper numbers) of subparagraphs A through 17."

3. In conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.

arrow