A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On June 19, 2012, the Defendant threatened the victim D (35 years of age) and the victim E (30 years of age) with knick, a dangerous thing at the office of Gangseo-si, Gangnam-si, Seoul (40 cm on June 17, 2012, and 10 cm on June 10, 201). The Defendant threatened the victim D (35 years of age), “E (30 years of age) to find the F and G, to find the head of the Gu, and to die and to contact with him/her as soon as possible.”

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous articles and threatened victims.

2. The suspect interfering with the work of the victims by citing and threatening the victim D and E as above at the time and place specified in Paragraph 1, thereby obstructing the victims from performing their duties such as the repair of the engine for about 30 minutes, thereby obstructing the victims’ work by force.

3. On June 22, 2012, the Defendant made a false report to the 112 reporting center of the Gyeonggi Provincial Police Agency at around 21:38, 2012, that “A person who is a placed tin seat H is leading to G and brings about G Handphones to go to the public phone,” and that the police officer in receipt of the report should be aware of the fact that G is actually kidnapped to a violent ship and should be informed of its location urgently. The Defendant searched police officers belonging to the Gangnam Police Station, the Gangnam Police Station, the Gangwon Police Station I Zone, the Seoul Young Police Station, the Gangwon Police Station, the Gangwon Police Agency, and the Human Police Station to search police officers belonging to the Gangwon-si Police Station, adjacent to the public telephone in front of the YJ, the National Assembly Library Party, the cell phone neighboring the National Assembly Library Party, and the mobile phone neighboring the base station station, and to search the police officers working for accommodation business in the vicinity.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers in relation to crime prevention and investigation.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police protocol of statement about D, E, and G;

1. A statement prepared by K;

1. Cases of reporting the results of an investigation into a reported case of kidnapping, cases of handling the 112 reported case, and cases of kidnapping received by the Gyeonggi Forest Service;