The defendant shall be innocent.

1. On September 28, 2013, around 01:55, the Defendant driven a Da QM5 vehicle under the influence of alcohol content 0.069%, at approximately KRW 300 meters from the street in front of the Sejong-dong Sejong-dong, Sejong-si to the street in front of the C apartment 102-dong.

2. The record reveals the following: (a) the Defendant, from September 28, 2013 to September 01:20, 201: (b) the Defendant, while driving the Defendant’s vehicle at a drinking place with eight members of the table of table of table of table of table of table of table of table of table of table of table of table of board of table of board of table of board of table of board of table of board of table of board of table of board of table of board of table of board of board of table of board of board of table of board of board of board of table of board of board of board of table of board of board of table of board of board of table of board of board of table of board of board of table of board of board of table of board of board of table of board of board of board of table of board of board of directors of the board of directors of the board of directors of table of board of directors of the board of directors of the board of directors of the board of directors,

The following facts acknowledged by the above facts reveal that the defendant had drinking at the time of an accident to a police officer, etc. dispatched at the time of an accident, i.e., it was true that the defendant made drinking at the time of an accident; however, he did not accurately memory the drinking volume; however, he did not take a little amount of drinking, and she went home after an accident, and made a statement that she would drink with drinking in large quantities; it is sufficiently possible for the defendant to drink a large amount of drinking as alleged by the defendant until around 06:00 when she was dispatched to the police on September 28, 2013; the defendant stated that she was drinking at the time of an accident to the police officer, etc. in relation to the volume of drinking after the accident; however, the defendant's statement that she was drinking at the time of the accident that she was drinking at the time of the accident, but the police station reversed the defendant's statement that she was aware that she was drinking at the time when she was a witness at the time of an accident.