beta
Text
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
Reasons
1. The gist of the grounds for appeal is that the Defendant did not drive under the influence of alcohol while driving in normal condition and arrived at the house, and the Defendant found the police officer to have found the vehicle and measured drinking by mixing it with drinking and drinking after mixing it with drinking and drinking.
Nevertheless, the court below erred by misapprehending the facts that recognized the Defendant's drinking driving.
2. The following circumstances revealed by the evidence duly admitted and investigated by the court below: ① around 21:16, Sep. 30, 2016, i.e.,: (a) the EM3 vehicle was parked in C at the time of show; (b) the above vehicle driver reported that the vehicle driver was driving; and (c) the police officer dispatched upon the above report at around 21:45 on the same day found the Defendant’s domicile, who was the owner of the above vehicle, and led the Defendant to conduct a drinking test after drinking the vehicle; (d) the Defendant was driving the vehicle at the time of drinking; and (e) the Defendant was asserting that the Defendant was not driving the vehicle after measuring the alcohol; and (e) the Defendant started to take a drinking test at the house, and (e) the police officer was not able to drink the vehicle at the Defendant’s house; (e) the Defendant was found to have taken a breath of drinking alcohol, such as opening the vehicle, alcohol, alcohol, and so on.
While opening beer's disease, dye's dye's dye's dye's dye's dye
A cleaning agent who did not make a consistent statement about the kind of drinking, such as the reversal of the statement, and the defendant did not make a consistent statement about the kind of drinking, and 5 The police officer measured the kind of drinking after having arrived at the house, drinking after drinking, and attempted to sleep thereafter.
One of the photographs taken by the Defendant at the time, it appears that the clothes of the Defendant appears to have been taken out of the country, and vi) In addition, when considering the statement of the situation of the principal driver who recorded the Defendant’s status at the time, the Defendant’s rhyth of the speech state, a minor unfolding forest, and a driver.