1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff, including the part resulting from the supplementary participation.

1. Basic facts

가. 이 사건 출원상표 1) 출원일/ 출원번호: C/ D 2) 구 성: 3) 지정상품: 상품류 구분 제33류의 알코올성 음료{맥주는 제외}, 소주, 과실주, 과일함유 알코올음료, 리큐어, 매실주, 베르뭇, 보드카, 브랜디 브랜디(brandy)라는 명칭은 브랜디와인(brandywine)의 줄임말인데, 넓은 의미로는 과실에서 양조증류한 술을 의미하지만, 보통의 경우에는 포도주를 증류한 술을 의미한다. 아래에서는 브랜디 원액을 블렌딩(blending, 혼합)하여 판매하는 제품을 ‘브랜디’라 칭하기로 한다. , 비터즈, 알코올엑기스, 유자주, 증류주, 칵테일, 포도주, 고량주, 딸기주, 럼주, 위스키, 알코올에센스 4) 출원인: 원고

B. Composition 1) of pre-use trademarks: LUDOV X, X, 2) user: the Intervenor joining the Defendant (hereinafter “ Intervenor”).

A person shall be appointed.

C. On March 5, 2015, the examiner of the Korean Intellectual Property Office decided to refuse the registration of the trademark applied in this case on the ground that “The trademark applied in this case is identical or similar to the pre-use trademarks of France, which are imported from French “Slauret” and used, and the trademark applied for registration of the trademark identical or similar to the trademark in the same or similar product knowing that it is used or prepared for use by another person through contractual relations, such as a partnership or employment, or business transactional relations or other relations, and thus, it cannot obtain trademark registration as it falls under Article 7(1)18 of the former Trademark Act (amended by Act No. 1403, Feb. 29, 2016; hereinafter the same).”