The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. After the occurrence of the instant traffic accident, the Defendant was aware of the fact that: (a) the Defendant 1 was a brue with two small brue and one brue with one brue at home; and (b) the Defendant did not drive a vehicle with one brue at the time of the said accident.

B. The lower court’s sentence of unreasonable sentencing (three million won of fine) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. According to the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below as to the assertion of mistake of fact, in particular, each legal statement of E and F, and the police's statement statement of G, the defendant can be found guilty of all the charges of this case including the fact that the defendant was involved in driving alcohol while drinking and caused the above accident. Thus, this part of the defendant's assertion is without merit.

[Defendant asserted that she was drinking at her house after the occurrence of the above accident that she was drinking at her house (1.7liter) and 1 disease per week. However, the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court below, i.e., (i) the police officer who found her house she was drinking at her house after the occurrence of the above accident, but did not present her house so, and the police officer did not find her house her house she did not find her house her house her house she did not find her house her house she. (ii) However, the defendant's house her house she was drinking at her house, and her house she was under the influence of drinking. ③ The defendant's house her house she was drinking at her house, and she did not make a statement to her house she was drinking at her house, and she was unable to make a statement to her during her house her house her house her house she was under the influence of her house her.