logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2019.05.01 2018나86986
손해배상(의)
Text

1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the plaintiff corresponding to the subsequent order of payment shall be revoked.

The defendant.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On August 14, 2015, the Plaintiff received the dump regional inhalement surgery (hereinafter “instant surgery”) from the Defendant’s water datum of KRW C operated by the Defendant.

B. The Defendant, in the course of the instant surgery, excavated the joints of the mouths (five parts) below the Plaintiff’s two pelle and Babs.

C. On August 28, 2015, the Plaintiff’s boomed off the instant surgery before removing the boomed boom, and then left a brue reflector. The Plaintiff shown that the brue reflector was depthed several times, but the Plaintiff was not crupted until now, and there was a reflector accompanied by the brue certificate.

지방흡입술의 경우 지방흡입을 위해 캐뉼라를 삽입하기 위해 피부에 절개를 가하게 되는데 그 과정에서 미용상 합병증으로 절개창의 흉터가 심각해지는 경우가 있다.

[Ground of recognition] 1 to 6, 8, and 1 of Gap evidence 1 to 1 (including branch numbers for those with serial numbers) and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The parties’ assertion A. The Defendant infringed the Plaintiff’s right to self-determination by failing to give sufficient explanation to the Plaintiff on the contents and side effects of the surgery before performing the instant surgery, and on testamentary gift.

Therefore, the defendant is seeking to pay the consolation money of eight million won.

B. Defendant Non-Empic reflector keld et al. were the abnormal reaction caused by an individual novel, and the Plaintiff had been diagnosed from July 2013 to undergo treatment, such as Non-Maternal plelar and Nickeld, and the Defendant confirmed the Plaintiff before the instant surgery that there was no particular error, and performed the instant operation in an ordinary manner with the consent of the Plaintiff that there was no particular error.

Since August 28, 2015, the Plaintiff removed the breadbed rice, the Plaintiff called keld keld keld keld kin, and the Plaintiff’s special transfer quality to the Defendant.

arrow