logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2018.06.01 2017나113752
손해배상(의)
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

Reasons

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. In fact 1, the instant association is a corporation operating a hospital with the trade name of “E” on the Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Daejeon. The Defendant, who is employed by the instant association, is an intention to conduct the scambling and the scaming, etc. of the Plaintiff. 2) On September 8, 2016 and September 20, 2016, the Plaintiff received from the Defendant the scaming and the scaming surgery, the scaming surgery, the scaming surgery around the snow, etc.

(hereinafter referred to as the “instant surgery. 3) At present, the Plaintiff appears to show an anti-occentive surgery around the upper left-hand side of the size of 8 cm, 2.5 cm in size x 1 cm in size, salkeing of the skin color, anti-salkeing of 1 cm in size, 2. anti-macifing of 6 cm in size, anti-macifing of the eye of the snow in the right-hand eye, salkeing of 6 cm in size, 3.3 7 cm in size in size. [In the absence of dispute over recognition, entry of evidence No. 2, 1, 3.5 cm in size, results of physical examination of the hospital head of the first instance court, the purport of the entire pleadings, as a result of the entire pleadings.

B. According to the above facts of recognition 1), the defendant neglected to conduct a detailed examination of the method of operation, etc. suitable for the plaintiff's physical condition while performing the instant surgery, and neglected to do so. However, the defendant caused the result of the plaintiff's emercation of snow and snow, which caused reflect around the plaintiff's eye, and the alteration of snow and snow. Therefore, the defendant is a medical team of the emercian who performed the instant surgery. The defendant is jointly liable for damages suffered by the plaintiff due to the negligence of the above procedure as the operator of the emercian. (2) The defendant is responsible for compensating for damages caused by the plaintiff due to the side effects caused by illegal beauty treatment before the plaintiff was performed the instant surgery from the defendant. Thus, the plaintiff's symptoms, such as the anti-grection of the surrounding eye and grecation of snow, etc., are newly caused by the instant surgery.

arrow