1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. On April 5, 2013, the Plaintiff received the correction of the sewage from both parties’ sexual surgery (hereinafter “instant sexual surgery”) in accordance with the method of cutting down the inner body of both sides, from the sexual surgery operated by the Defendant.

B. The Plaintiff, according to the face value that was cut off in the course of the instant sex surgery, was in the form of a master body around his wheels and following it, in the form of an calendar in the form of an calendar.

【Ground for recognition】 The fact that there has been no dispute, the purport of whole pleading

2. Summary of the plaintiff's assertion

A. 1) The Defendant has a duty of care to perform the surgery in such a way as not to have a chest left or to remain at least on the chest while performing the instant sex surgery. The Defendant neglected to do so, which led the Plaintiff’s emotional distressed around the Plaintiff’s fluid, and the Plaintiff’s two fluids from 2000 to 1000 to 2000 to 2000 to 2000 to 2000 to 2000 to 2000 to 2000 to 2000 to 2000. In addition, the Defendant did not actively treat or manage the Plaintiff’s chests after the instant surgery, so far as 1 year to 200 to 200 to 2000 to 2000 to 2000 to 2000 to 2000 to 200 to 200 to 200 to 200 to 200 to 200 to 200.

3 The defendant explained to the plaintiff before the sex surgery of this case that "after the final recovery cannot be seen well, but there may be a difference between body and body," and that the chest will be naturally cured after the lapse of time, and if it is a obsive reflectr constitution, it may remain scarbly and scarbly as in the present condition, and if it is a scarbly scarbly, it may continue permanently.