logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 안동지원 2018.05.29 2017고단457
보험사기방지특별법위반등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

(A) A person who is engaged in driving of a taxi for rocketing business owned by the victim B Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “victim B taxi company”), and D jointly accused is a person who is engaged in driving of Esch Rexroth vehicles owned by the victim M&C company (hereinafter “victim F&C”).

On February 2, 2017, the Defendant and D, using the fact that the above taxi driven by the Defendant, who was driven by the Defendant, is subscribed to the comprehensive insurance of the victim nationwide taxi mutual aid association (hereinafter “victim Mutual Aid Association”) (hereinafter “victim Mutual Aid Association”), the Defendant and D attempted to conceal the above Bosch Rexroth vehicle driven by the above taxi driving by the above taxi at the intersection when he stops in the atmosphere of signal at the intersection and caused a traffic accident by intentionally taking advantage of the above Bosch Rexroth vehicle driven by the above taxi, and obtain the insurance money from the victim Mutual Aid Association as if the traffic accident occurred by chance.

1. Violation D of the Special Act on the Prevention of Insurance Fraud, on February 11, 2017, runs from the J Hospital located in Ansan-si F on the front side of the G, Andong-si, at the same time, with H on the top of the foregoing Bosch Rexroth vehicle, and then coming from the J Hospital located in Andong-si I. The Defendant: (a) while driving the said taxi and following the Bosch Rexroth vehicle; (b) around 19:53 on the same day, D stopped on yellow signal from the front edge of the above Bosch Rex vehicle at the Seo-dong-dong-si, Shodong-si, Shodong-si, and as the Defendant recruited, checked the front side of the above Bosch Rex vehicle at the right edge of the above taxi.

As such, the Defendant: (a) as if the foregoing accident was intentionally caused by the victim’s association to receive insurance proceeds; (b) as if it was a traffic accident due to the failure of safety distance securing, immediately after the accident, reported to the effect that “the front car driver while driving a taxi, caused the accident to the wind to stop from the yellow fire; and (c) the victim’s association via K around February 13, 2017.

arrow