The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is true that the defendant intrudes into D's residence, but there is no injury or assault against D or F.

2. In light of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the lower court, the fact that the Defendant, together with C, inflicted an injury on D and assaulted F is recognized.

Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

① D는 수사기관에서 원심 법정에 이르기까지 피고인이 C과 함께 D의 집에 들어와서 C은 피고인의 머리채를 붙들고, 피고인은 발로 D의 몸을 걷어찼으며, F가 시끄러운 소리를 듣고 나오자 피고인이 F에게 ‘회사로 찾아가서 회사를 못 다니게 한다’고 욕을 하며 F의 머리채를 잡아 흔들었다고 진술하였는바, 진술내용이 구체적이고 일관되어 신빙성이 있다.

② The F also stated that the Defendant and C attached D, as the investigative agency hears voice from the lower court to the lower court’s trial, and that F expressed that the Defendant “I will see the face in the workplace and throw away from the face. I will not see it. I will see the face in Chuncheon,” and that F will see F’s head debt.” The details of the statement are concrete and consistent and consistent.

③ On the other hand, the Defendant asserted that C first entered D’s house and waiting outside of D, and that C was sweeted with D and sweeted, and that C was sweeted with F, and that C was able to take care of D when entering the ward.

However, even though C had been suspected that D had a winded with her husband and left D's house, it seems to be exceptional that the Defendant did not enter the house with C, and it is also difficult to believe that C, D, and F had been witnessed in the ward.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion.