The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. In order to re-enter a mistake of facts, the Defendant merely expressed his/her intent to enter the victim's house into the ward and did not have a tightly damaged fact, and the lower court found the facts charged and convicted the Defendant, thereby adversely affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

B. The sentence imposed by the court below on the defendant (200,000 won of fine) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. In the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below regarding the assertion of mistake of facts, E, in the police and court of the court below, witness E talked that "I am "I am" and the defendant's husband F am out of the front door by talking that I am "I am" and the defendant and the defendant's husband F am. In addition, the defendant again am out of the front door through the open door while I am am going back with the front door while I am going back to the front door and again, I am am out of the front door, so I am am so I am am so I am am so I am am am so we would am am am scam again, and the defendant was pushed off several times in the process, and the victim was pushed by the new door, and the victim was scambling with the victim's body and the defendant's body inside the front door through the entrance of the police room."

The position of the defendant toward the fluor, the defendant was changed to the fluor of the fluor, and he said that he would be "to be in accordance with the law" at that time;