beta
Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of four million won.
If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. The defendant who violated the Attorney-at-Law Act is not a lawyer.
Around January 27, 2015, the Defendant: (a) received a request from the CKafe, “F to receive KRW 29.5 million in lieu of receiving KRW 20,500,000,000; (b) promised to receive KRW 300,000 in return; (c) made an application for payment order for F in the name of E in the name of the Defendant’s office at G B B B 402, G B 402, around the 22th day of the same month; (d) submitted it to the public official in charge at the Incheon District District District Court’s Branch Branch, Dong-si, 129, Seocheon-si, Seoul; and (e) on or around the 27th day of the same month, submitted an application for provisional attachment of F’s property in the name of the Defendant’s office to the public official in charge of the provisional attachment in the name of E prepared at the above public service center on or around the 28th day of the same month, and received KRW 300,00.
Accordingly, the defendant, not a lawyer, handled legal affairs such as preparation of legal documents with respect to legal cases.
2. Around January 22, 2015, the Defendant forged private document: (a) stated the Defendant’s office as described in paragraph (1) in the name of E in lieu of E, that “F” was “29,50,000 won in the form of a loan instrument using a gate; (b) “3% in December 31, 2002; (c) in the column of due date for repayment”; (d) stated “F” in the debtor column; (e) in the creditor column, “E” and in the date column, “E” and sealed the Defendant subsequent to the name of F.
Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising, the Defendant forged a letter of borrowed money in the name of F, a private document on rights and obligations.
3. On January 23, 2015, the Defendant’s uttering of the above investigation document is duly constituted by the Incheon District Court’s Branch Support civil petition office as described in paragraph (1) with respect to a public official in charge of being aware of the forgery as described in paragraph (2).