1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On October 15, 2010, the Defendant: (a) executed the third-lane B bid on August 17, 201; and (b) August 16, 2012, respectively; and (c) concluded each of the instant bids with the Defendant who representing the Republic of Korea and supplied B, after being selected as the successful bidder.

B. On July 22, 2015, the Defendant: (a) notified the Plaintiff of the contract number/case number C (hereinafter “C”) B (hereinafter “First B purchase contract”); (b) D (hereinafter “Second B purchase contract”); (c) E (hereinafter “E”) (hereinafter “third B purchase contract”); and (d) the former Act on Contracts to Which the State Is a Party (amended by Act No. 11547, Dec. 18, 2012; hereinafter “former State Contracts Act”); (b) Article 27(1) of the former Enforcement Decree of the State Contracts Act (amended by Presidential Decree No. 24601, Jun. 17, 2013; hereinafter “former State Contracts Act”); (c) Article 76(1) through (d) of the Enforcement Decree of the State Contracts Act (amended by Presidential Decree No. 24601, Aug. 28, 2012); and (d) Article 76(1) of the former Enforcement Decree of the State Contracts Act (amended by Presidential Decree No. 24601, Jun. 17, 2017

(hereinafter “instant disposition”). C.

The Defendant clarified the grounds for the instant disposition in the instant lawsuit as the facts that submitted false documents as shown below.

On October 15, 2010, the false documents and details submitted to the contract subject to the bidding date and the contract for the purchase of B on October 1, 2010.