logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2017.01.19 2015구합70461
입찰참가자격제한처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. The Defendant issued a 16 test report (hereinafter “instant test report”) to the Defendant in the course of implementing the 11st contract (hereinafter “instant contract”) as indicated in the following table, on the ground that the Plaintiff submitted the 16 test report (hereinafter “instant test report”) to the Defendant, the Defendant: (a) Article 27(1) of the former Act on Contracts to Which the State is a Party (amended by Act No. 14038, Mar. 2, 2016; hereinafter “State Contract Act”); (b) Article 76(1)8 of the Enforcement Decree of the same Act (amended by Presidential Decree No. 26829, Dec. 31, 2015; hereinafter “Enforcement Decree of the State Contract Act”); and (c) Article 76(1) [Attachment 2] [Attachment 10(1) and 30(1) of the Enforcement Rule of the same Act (amended by Ordinance of the Ministry of Strategy and Finance, Feb. 1, 2016; hereinafter “Enforcement Rule of the State Contract Act”).

(11) Contract number . (2) . 1 B (1) 1 B (2D (2. 3 June 201) E (1) 2D (1. 1) 2D (2D 1) c (2) c (2) C (2nd 8 December 201. 21. 3) C (2nd 3 G (2nd 3 G) 4 G (21 December 201. 21.) 5 H 5 H (2nd 5 H. 3 (2nd 14 June 14, 2012) C (2nd 3rd 3) 3 (2nd 14th 14th 2nd 5th 204) 3rd 14th 2nd 14th 5th 3rd 14th 5th 3rd 5th 14th 5th 2012) 3rd 14th 5th 3rd 14th 20.

arrow