1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Basic Facts

On June 19, 2012, the Plaintiff entered into a purchase contract with the Defendant to purchase the amount of KRW 495 million (including value-added tax) of KRW 495 million (including the model).

(2) On December 31, 2012, the Plaintiff entered into a purchase agreement with the Defendant on December 31, 2012 (hereinafter “instant secondary purchase agreement”). On December 31, 2012, the Plaintiff entered into a purchase agreement with the Defendant (hereinafter “instant secondary purchase agreement”) to purchase the subject matter to KRW 572 million (including value added tax) (hereinafter “the instant secondary purchase agreement”), and the subject matter is “the instant secondary painting,” and the subject matter is “the instant painting,” and Article 6(3) E of the instant secondary purchase agreement (Evidence 2) stating that “The Plaintiff’s submission of all specifications and parts of the equipment is identical to the equipment that were supplied without charge,” and the Plaintiff’s submission of the Plaintiff’s new purchase agreement with the Plaintiff (hereinafter “the Plaintiff’s submission of the equipment”) should be considered as the Plaintiff’s submission of the equipment to the Plaintiff.

The Plaintiff’s employees in charge of entering into the instant 1 and 2 purchase contract had entered into the instant secondary purchase contract upon the Defendant’s recommendation that “after entering into the instant first purchase contract,” and that “after entering into the instant first purchase contract,” the Defendant entered into the instant secondary purchase contract. The Defendant stated the Plaintiff’s requirements in the printed contract form, and affixed the Plaintiff’s seal and affixed the copy, and the copy was kept by the Plaintiff, and the copy was delivered by G to the Plaintiff’s director in charge of the Defendant’s contract.