1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On March 19, 2018, the Plaintiff was an employee of the Plaintiff Company B, who fells below approximately 1.3 meters of the goods while carrying approximately 30 km of the goods on the board, in order to load them into the vehicle.

(hereinafter “instant accident”). (b)

The Plaintiff was determined by the Defendant on the approval of the medical care benefits with respect to the “existing injury and disease” (hereinafter referred to as the “existing injury and disease”).

C. On May 15, 2018, the Plaintiff was diagnosed of “the escape certificate of a protruding signboard on the left-hand side of the fifth grade-1,00, and the escape certificate of a protruding signboard on the left-hand side, and a protruding signboard escape certificate and a protruding card on the left-hand side of the fourth-5 (hereinafter “the instant additional injury and disease”), and applied for an additional injury and disease.

On July 19, 2018, after deliberation by the advisory society, the Defendant notified the Plaintiff of non-approval on the Plaintiff’s application on the ground that “the instant additional injury and disease cannot prove the causal relationship with the existing injury and disease.”

(hereinafter “instant disposition”) e.

The Plaintiff filed a petition for examination against the instant disposition, but the Defendant dismissed the petition for examination on November 6, 2018.

F. The Plaintiff filed a request for reexamination on November 20, 2018, but the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Reexamination Committee rendered a ruling dismissing the request for reexamination on February 14, 2019, and sent a written ruling on March 14, 2019 to the Plaintiff.

【Non-contentious facts, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 3 (if there are provisional numbers, including each number; hereinafter the same shall apply), Eul evidence No. 3, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The Plaintiff’s assertion that the instant additional injury and disease was recognized as a causal relationship with the instant accident, but the instant disposition that rejected the instant additional injury and disease was unlawful.

3. Attached statements to the relevant Acts and subordinate statutes;

4. Determination

A. A disease caused by occupational accidents under the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act (the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act) is caused by the worker’s performance of his/her duties.