1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On March 1, 1995, the Plaintiff joined a stock company B (hereinafter “instant place of business”) and provided medical care until May 31, 2017 upon obtaining the Defendant’s medical care approval from the Defendant on September 22, 2016, while performing the installation work, etc. of a mooring room under the control of the mechanical book.

B. During the medical treatment as above, the Plaintiff was diagnosed as follows: “Isknel, the left-hand skin-skin-skin-skin-skin-skin-skin-skin-skin-skin-skin-skin-skin-skin-skin-skin-skin-skin-skin-skin-skin-skin-skin-skin-skin-skin-skin-skin-skin-skin-skin-kin-skin-skin-skin-skin-skin-kin-skin-skin-kin-skin-skin-kin-kin-skin-kin-kin-sk in-kin-kin-kin-k

C. The Plaintiff was diagnosed as to the escape certificate of protruding (hereinafter “instant additional injury and disease”) No. 3-4, and applied for medical care benefits to the Defendant, but the Defendant rendered a disposition not to grant medical care on July 16, 2018.

On July 26, 2018, the Plaintiff filed an application with the Defendant for the additional medical care for the instant additional injury and disease, but the Defendant rendered a disposition of non-approval of the additional injury and disease on September 6, 2018 on the ground that “the instant additional injury and disease have no causal relation with occupational accidents due to the progress of their happiness following the natural progress” (hereinafter “instant disposition of non-approval of the additional injury and disease in the instant disposition”).

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 4, 7 through 10, 12, Eul evidence Nos. 1, 3 and 4, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The plaintiff's work contents are the plaintiff's assertion.