1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On March 7, 2015, the Plaintiff: (a) discovered at the 16th floor of the site of the new construction of a hospital, and discovered at the 15th floor of materials so that he/she can eroke and eroke (hereinafter the instant accident); and (b) obtained approval from the Defendant for medical care benefits under the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act as to the Defendant’s “the erode pelkele pelle, the left-hand pelle, the upper-hand pelkele, the upper-hand pelkele, the erokele, the erokele, the erokele 1, 2, and 3; (c) 2,4,5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, and 12, the left-hand left-hand side of the hospital; and (d) obtained approval for the medical care benefits under the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act.

B. On July 21, 2015, the Plaintiff filed an application for an additional injury and disease with respect to “a failure to perform the right-side interest, the right-to-side interest, the right-to-side interest, and other power-driven interest” (hereinafter “the instant additional injury and disease”), and the Defendant: (a) deemed that “the instant additional injury and disease is verified, but cannot be recognized as causation with the disaster”; and (b) rendered a disposition not to approve the said application (hereinafter “instant disposition”).

C. The Plaintiff filed a request for examination against the instant disposition. However, the Defendant rejected the request for examination on December 11, 2015 on the ground that “the Plaintiff’s hearing ability is normal, in particular, due to the increase of age, and the high-frequency District Office’s personal disease irrelevant to credit.”

The Plaintiff filed a request for reexamination, but was dismissed on November 26, 2015 for the foregoing reasons.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap 1 through 3, Eul 1 through 5, purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the disposition is lawful;

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion that the instant additional injury and disease occurred due to the instant accident, and thus, the instant disposition based on a different premise is unlawful.

B. After the instant accident, the Plaintiff was diagnosed of the instant injury and disease.

Generally, the causes of the instant additional injury are diverse, such as trauma infection, virus infection, stress, and dysive disease.

The medical opinion of the appraisal: The plaintiff is the opinion of the High-frequency Agency on each side in the net lution test conducted on June 12, 2015, July 16, 2015, and July 20, 2015.