Text
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Details of the disposition;
A. On April 15, 2015, the Plaintiff was diagnosed as follows: “In the process of performing painting duties by entering B Co., Ltd. on February 14, 1984; on April 15, 2015, the Plaintiff was diagnosed as follows: “In the semi-monthly fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral sect, the left-hand slot, the anti-monthly fluoral fluoral sect, the left-hand slot, the anti-monthly fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluor fluor fluor fluor fluor fluor fluor fluor fluor fluor fluor fluor fluor fluor fluor f.17.7.
B. On May 19, 2017, the Defendant issued a non-approval disposition of the medical plan for additional injury and disease (hereinafter “instant disposition”) on the ground that “In full view of the Plaintiff’s disaster circumstance, name of the injury or disease, treatment progress, medical opinions on the state of the injury or disease, etc., the instant additional injury or disease is determined as a low-income disease, and the symptoms that no longer expected treatment cannot be expected are fixed” (hereinafter “instant disposition”).
C. The Plaintiff filed a request for examination against the Defendant on November 1, 2017, but the Defendant dismissed the request. The Plaintiff re-appealed to the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Reexamination Committee, but the said Committee dismissed the request on May 15, 2018.
[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 1, 2, and Eul evidence 2.