A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On July 29, 2010, the Defendant issued a summary order of a fine of four million won due to a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) at the Daegu District Court on July 29, 2010, and on May 16, 2014, the same court issued a summary order of a fine of five million won for the same crime, and on May 16, 2018, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of eight months for the same crime.

Criminal facts

1. On November 17, 2019, at around 06:25, the Defendant driven a dice halog car without obtaining a driver’s license with a blood alcohol concentration of about 0.144% in the section of about 5km up to the ductal distance front of the ductal road in front of the C-U.S. public parking lot located in Nowon-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City (Seoul Special Metropolitan City) from around 06:25 to the ductal road.

2. When the Defendant: (a) was discovered while drinking and driving without a license at the date and time, at the place specified in the foregoing Paragraph (1) above; and (b) was demanded by F of the Police Station Escoping Police Station to submit a signature and seal on the report on the statement of the state of the driver; (c) was conducted as if he were G using the Defendant’s model G resident registration number, the Defendant, who was going on and out of the ordinary letter, and the name of the driver of the report on the state of the state of the driver; (d) was stated as “G”; (c) signed as “G” in the personal information column of the written statement; (d) stated the name of “G” in the name column; and (e) signed as “G” next.

As a result, the Defendant, without authority, forged the driver’s statement and the written statement in G name, which is a private document related to the certification of facts, for the purpose of uttering.

3. The Defendant, at the time and place of the foregoing paragraph (2) above, completed the report and written statement with respect to the master driver’s statement under the name of G who was forged, with F and G, without knowledge of the forgery.