logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원순천지원 2020.12.03 2020고단892
도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Around 18:30 on November 16, 2019, the Defendant was driving a gallon car under the influence of alcohol concentration of 0.204% without a vehicle driver’s license in a section of about 14km from a section of about 14km to a gallon, in which the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol level of 0.204% without a vehicle driver’s license.

2. The Defendant, at the same time and place as Paragraph 1, was subject to a alcohol measurement by the police officer F of the Macheon Police Station E (a police box) at the same time and place as that of Paragraph 1, entered “G”, which is the name of the Defendant’s sentence, at his own discretion, in the name column of the report on the statement of the state of the State-employed driver, using a black-type pen, and signed “G” on the name side of the name of the Defendant. The Defendant, who was aware of the forged facts, stated the false statement of the state-employed driver’s circumstantial statement to F as if the report

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising a certificate of fact, the Defendant forged and exercised one copy of G’s circumstantial statement report, which is a private document related to the certification of fact.

3. The Defendant, at the same time and place as Paragraph 1, entered the Defendant’s name and resident registration number, and entered the Defendant’s name in the Defendant’s name on the screen of the portable Information Terminal (PDA), and entered “G” in the driver’s column of the notification of the result of the drinking driving control, using an electronic pen, and issued the Defendant’s signature forged on that spot to the Defendant F without knowledge of the forged fact.

Accordingly, the defendant forged another person's signature and exercised it for the purpose of exercising it.

4. The Defendant violated the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act: (a) operated a car with a gallon that was owned by the Defendant who did not purchase mandatory insurance from September 19, 2018 to November 16, 2019.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant;

arrow