Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine for negligence of 500,000 won, and by a fine of 3,00,000 won, respectively.

The above fine is imposed against the Defendants.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B is the head of the D religious organization in Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, who is in charge of managing the church, and Defendant A is the head of the said church.

The above church was a pastor of the church in 2015.

The F pastor was subject to the disposition of suspension from office due to the disciplinary action against a religious order and the G pastor was performing his duties as the chairman of the church, and there has been disputes between the members supporting F pastor and the G pastor, and as the members supporting F pastor performed the worship in the above three-story wedding room, underground-friendly class, and the first floor of the church, the E church church resolution was adopted to prohibit the worship in the above place, and the entrance of the above place was corrected around January 10, 2016.

Accordingly, H and I filed an application for the exclusion of interference with the Seoul Western District Court on March 31, 2017, and around March 15:26, 2017, the enforcement officer J with the Seoul Western District Court attached a disposition notice to the effect that: (a) the exclusion of interference with the activities of creditors, such as the towing of the third floor of the above church; (b) the underground distribution room; (c) the underground distribution class of the first floor; and (d) each entrance of the first floor poor in the first floor, by means of locking the door, etc.; and (d) the obligor’s removal of locks and other obstacles from the closed door.

1. The Defendant, as above, posted a provisional disposition mark attached to the lower entrance of the first floor of the above church on April 1, 2017, even though the enforcement officer of the Seoul Western District Court’s execution officer’s judgment attached a disposition of prohibition of interference with the Defendant’s official duties, the Defendant removed the provisional disposition mark attached to the lower entrance of the first floor of the above church on April 16:00.

Accordingly, the defendant damaged the indication of the compulsory disposition that a public official performed in relation to his duties.

2. When the above disposition was rendered by Defendant B with the exclusion of interference, the above church shall be a three-story worship of the above church of the members including H and I, and the above church shall be underground.