1. Each of the plaintiffs' claims is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

1. Basic facts

A. The status of the parties 1) Plaintiff A church (hereinafter “Plaintiff church”)

) The E Religious Organization Assembly (hereinafter referred to as the “FEU”) shall:

A) An individual church belonging to Busan, and a building with a size of 394 square meters and its ground (hereinafter referred to as “instant real estate”) belonging to Busan, Seo-gu G (Seoul, Seo-gu, Busan), Busan, and a building with its ground (hereinafter referred to as “instant real estate”).

(2) The plaintiff B is the pastor of the plaintiff church and the representative of the plaintiff church, and the defendant was in the position of the Si armed forces. The plaintiff church is in the position of the Si armed forces.

B. On April 29, 2016, the Plaintiff church and the ISIS meeting were held on May 1, 2016 with the approval of the merger of the FIS meeting on April 29, 2016, and were merged into the Plaintiff church around that time. The Plaintiff church, which was the head of the Plaintiff church before the merger, was the head of the Plaintiff church, and became the head of the Plaintiff church, and the Defendant became the head of the Si Council, and the Defendant became the head of the Si Council. 2) On June 10, 2016, the Defendant was convicted of the Defendant on charges of fraud, etc. (the Busan District Court Decision 2015No750, 2016No101, 101, 201, 2000). On July 4, 2016, the Defendant filed a complaint with the Plaintiff church to support the Plaintiff church’s non-Confidence member of the Plaintiff church (hereinafter “Plaintiff 1”) on the date of the merger.

3) On July 15, 2016, H H pastor requested the Jorsing Council, a superior agency, to dispatch members for cooperation. On July 16, 2016, the Jsing Council sent K pastors and L L L to the Plaintiff church as a cooperative member. On the same day, the Plaintiff church held a party meeting in the presence of K pastors, H pastors, Plaintiff B, and L, and decided on July 24, 2016 that “the non-Confidence of the Defendant shall be decided at the Joint Council on July 24, 2016, and the Defendant shall suspend the duties of the representative Council and the church until the case is resolved.”