A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months and by a fine not exceeding 400,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine.

Punishment of the crime

"2016 Highest 4031"

1. On June 8, 2016, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol in C-si around 23:15 on June 8, 2016, and was demanded to pay taxi charges from police officers F (46 years old) and return home in front of E-be located in Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D.

However, the Defendant was unable to get off the taxi, and the Defendant was able to get out of the earth, and the Defendant was unable to bring the disturbance into the earth, and the F corrected the entrance, but the Defendant continued to set up a entrance to prevent the Defendant from getting out of the entrance, such as cutting off the entrance, but the Defendant assaulted the F’s body one time by driving off the lower part of the F with his hand.

As a result, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties of police officers.

2. The Defendant in violation of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act was arrested as a flagrant offender due to interference with the performance of official duties at the time and place specified in paragraph (1) above, and upon being under the influence of alcohol, “C” for police officers within the district including F

The death will be caused by the death of the deceased and the death of the entire person who died.

D. Family members will receive pension.

Chewing typhere ..." and approximately 30 minutes of sound have been expressed.

Accordingly, the defendant, in a district in which a public office is a public office, has carried a very rough horse and behavior by doing so, and slickly.

"2016 Highest 5555"

3. The Defendant, in Seo-gu, Incheon Metropolitan City, was working as the head of the production support team of the distribution engine in order to borrow money under the pretext of resolving the Defendant’s guaranteed obligation, by means of deceptioning that the Defendant, at the end of 2014, had the victim B, who was an employee, bear the Defendant’s guarantee obligation of KRW 80,000,000,000.

The Defendant, at the early March 2015, borrowed money from the Defendant’s “H” to the Defendant, to resolve the problem of deposit guarantee if he/she borrowed money under the name of the Defendant, and to receive money again under the name of the Defendant.