A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Criminal facts

"2012 Highest 3199"

1. Crimes on October 22, 2012

A. On October 22, 2012, the Defendant forged private documents written “C”, “D”, “C”, and “C” in the applicant column in the name column of the application for re-issuance of driver’s license printed in advance using a black pen at the Dowing License Examination Station located in Nowon-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Nowon-gu.

Accordingly, the defendant, without authority, forged a request for re-issuance of a driver's license in the name of C, which is a private document about a certificate of fact.

B. The Defendant at the time and place indicated in paragraph (1) of this Article, and at the same time and place, issued and exercised an application for re-issuance of a forged driver’s license to E, as if the application was duly completed, and the Defendant did not exercise his/her resident registration certificate under C, which was an official document acquired in advance to verify his/her identity, by presenting it to the said employee as if he/she was the Defendant’s identification witness.

2. Crimes on October 31, 2012;

A. On October 31, 2012, the Defendant illegally holding official documents was arrested in a flagrant offender in relation to theless fraud case in the Seoul Gwangjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City F District, and was demanded by the police officer G belonging to the above F District to present an identification card to verify the identity, and the C’s driver’s license was issued as stated in paragraph 1(b) as the Defendant’s identification witness.

Accordingly, the defendant did not exercise his driver's license, which is an official document.

B. On October 31, 2012, around 04:20 on October 31, 2012, the Defendant: (a) conducted the investigation of the Mine Police Station and the office located in the Gwangjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, as if he were C in relation to the intangible fraud case; (b) conducted an investigation as if he were C; and (c) recorded “C” at the end of the protocol of interrogation of suspect; and (d

Accordingly, the defendant has forged C's signature without authority for the purpose of exercising his authority.

(c).