The judgment of the first instance shall be revoked.

The defendant shall start from August 27, 2013 with respect to KRW 9,335,689 and KRW 3,904,124 among the plaintiff.

1. In full view of the facts that there is no dispute between the parties to the determination on the cause of the claim, and the overall purport of the entries and arguments in Gap's evidence Nos. 1 through 9, the plaintiff can be found to have received each of the claims listed below from the mutual savings bank on April 10, 2009, from the TNan loan on June 29, 2012, from the defendant, and notified the defendant of the acquisition of each claim.

(2) On March 18, 2008, 200, 100,000,000,000,000 won from March 18, 2008, 2008, 203,003,000,000 won from the following day: (a) the transferee institution name primary debtor debtor debtor debtor debtor debtor debtor debtor debtor debtor debtor debtor debtor debtor debtor debtor debtor debtor debtor debtor debtor debtor debtor debtor debtor debtor debtor debtor debtor debtor debtor debtor debtor debtor debtor debtor debtor debtor debtor debtor debtor debtor debtor debtor debtor debtor 1,00,000,000,000,000, 290,000, 3,90,04,124, 5,431, 5659, 3689.

2. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is justified, and the judgment of the court of first instance is unfair, and the plaintiff's appeal is revoked and the judgment of the court of first instance is accepted.