1. The part of the judgment of the first instance against the plaintiff shall be revoked.

2. The defendant shall pay to the plaintiff KRW 10,804,959 and 4,129 among them.

1. At the first instance trial, the Plaintiff filed a claim against the Defendant for the amount of money taken over from the Defendant, Spanish Loan Co., Ltd., Lived Co., Ltd., Lived Co., Ltd., Lived Co., Ltd., and the company specializing in the securitization of the Adived Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the “Adived Co., Ltd.”), and the Daejeon Western Co., Ltd., the first instance court dismissed the claim for the amount of money taken over from the Pd Co., Ltd. and accepted the remainder of the amount of money taken over. Since only the Plaintiff appealed against the said part of the loss, the subject of the trial at the first instance trial is limited to the claim for money taken over from the Ed Co., Ltd. and the claim for money taken over from the specialized securitization of the

2. According to the overall purport of the statements and arguments set forth in Gap evidence Nos. 4, 8, 9, and 10 (including virtual numbers) as to the cause of the claim, the plaintiff acquired the claim against A, as shown below (the balance of the loan and the base date of the attempted interest are December 29, 2013) as stated in the following table, and delegated the power to notify the transfer, and the plaintiff notified the defendant of the transfer of the above claim on August 28, 2012, and February 26, 2013. The defendant agreed to pay the overdue interest rate set by the financial institution while engaging in loan transactions as listed in the following table, and the overdue interest rate set by the plaintiff can be acknowledged as 17% per annum from the date following the date of confirmation of each claim.

A Small Credit Loans of KRW 2,130,231,231,41,418, and KRW 4,129,955,675,04,80,959, and KRW 2,586, May 1, 2012, 2012, A Small Credit Loans of KRW 2,130,591,586, and KRW 310,000,00,000,000,000,000,000 won on July 31, 2013, 2013, including the attempted balance of the loan and the assets confirmation date of the loan extended to the transferring institution principal debtor. According to the above facts, the Defendant acquired the principal and interest from the Plaintiff.