logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2015. 03. 31. 선고 2014누47541 판결
원고가 소외회사 경영권을 양도하고 취득한 소득은 기타소득에 해당함[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul Administrative Court 2013Guhap10731 ( October 25, 2014)

Title

Income acquired by the plaintiff after transferring the management right of the non-party company shall be deemed other income.

Summary

In light of the fact that the Plaintiff entered into a contract for acquisition by transfer of management and issued a receipt for the price, it is reasonable to deem that the price in this case belongs to the Plaintiff, the nominal

Cases

2014Nu47541 Global income and revocation of disposition

Plaintiff and appellant

Section AA

Defendant, Appellant

head of Sung Dong Tax Office

Judgment of the first instance court

Seoul Administrative Court Decision 2013Guhap10731 Decided March 25, 2014

Conclusion of Pleadings

March 3, 2015

Imposition of Judgment

March 31, 2015

Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The judgment of the first instance is revoked, and the defendant revoked the disposition of imposition of global income tax of KRW 8,220,211,620 on October 11, 201 against the plaintiff on October 11, 201.

Reasons

1. Quotation of judgment of the first instance;

The reasoning of this court's explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except that the statement of No. 11 and No. 12 of the 8th of the judgment of the court of first instance, and the testimony of No. 12 to No. 24 of the 'O of the witness' and the testimony of No. 12 through No. 24 of the 'O' and the testimony of No. 12 through No. 24 of the 'O' of the witness of the court of first instance (including each number), and each testimony of No. O of the witness of the court of first instance, Park Ga, and ParkB of the party witness of the court of first instance are as stated in the same part

2. Conclusion

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance with the same conclusion is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow