logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2018.04.05 2017나5894
손해배상(자)
Text

1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against Plaintiff A, B, and C equivalent to the following amount ordered to be paid:

Reasons

1. The reason why this court should explain is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the addition of the pertinent part among the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance, and therefore, it is citing it as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

[Supplementary or written in addition] Part IV of the decision of the court of first instance shall be added as follows:

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1, 3 evidence, Eul evidence 3 (including paper numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Except as otherwise mentioned below within the scope of liability for damages, the entries in the corresponding column of the attached Table of Calculation of Compensation Amount.

(For the convenience of calculation, less than a month shall be included in the side on which the appraised value is less than the last month and less than the last month shall be discarded, and in principle, the period shall be calculated on a monthly basis, and the present price calculation at the time of the accident due to the above accident shall be in accordance with the discount method which deducts intermediary interest at the rate of 5/12 per month, and it shall be excluded if not separately mentioned).

The rate of loss of labor ability and actual income 1) Personal information: as stated in the corresponding column of the annexed sheet of calculation of damages: 2) Income and operating period: Urban daily wage (ordinary wage) from the date of the accident to the age of 60, and urban daily wage from the date of the accident to the age of 60, and the above income shall be deemed to have been made available each 2th day of the month until the age of 60.

In this regard, the plaintiff asserts that the daily income should be calculated by applying the daily wage of a special worker in an urban area, as he/she worked as an air-conditioner installation engineer in I.

In the event that the victim had had certain income while working in the workplace at the time of the accident, there are objective data that can determine actual income at the time of the accident against the victim, and thus reasonable and objective expectation income is generated.

arrow