1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the Plaintiff corresponding to the following additional payment order shall be revoked.

1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation on this part of the facts is that of the corresponding part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, they are cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. The reasons why the court should explain this part of the defendant's liability for damages and set-off ratio of negligence are as stated in the corresponding part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, this part is cited by the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure

3. Except as otherwise mentioned below within the scope of liability for damages, the entries in the corresponding column of the attached Table of Calculation of Compensation Amount.

(For the convenience of calculation, less than a month shall be included in the side on which the appraised value is less than the last month and less than the last month shall be discarded, and in principle, the period shall be calculated on a monthly basis, and the present price calculation at the time of the accident due to the above accident shall be in accordance with the discount method which deducts intermediary interest at the rate of 5/12 per month, and it shall be excluded if not separately mentioned).

Personal information: The rate of loss of labor ability and actual income 1) Personal information: as shown in the corresponding column for calculation of the amount of compensation in attached Form: 2) Income: Urban Daily Wage (Ordinary Part) shall apply, and the above income shall be deemed to have been earned each 22th day of the month from the accident in this case until the next market year recognized below.

In this regard, the plaintiff is running a simple manufacturing business with steel technology that produces and supplies gardening goods, which are steel structures, as a person with steel technology. Since the plaintiff's business income is less than the labor wages as a steel hole, it is highly probable that the plaintiff will work as a steel hole, the plaintiff's business income should be calculated as a basis for calculating the lost income.

When the victim was working in the workplace at the time of the accident, the accident is about the victim.