1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the defendant in excess of the money ordered to be paid below shall be revoked.

1. The reasons for the court’s explanation concerning this case are as follows, except for the portion “3. Scope of liability for damages” from Chapter 4 to Chapter 6 of the judgment of the court of first instance. As such, it is consistent with the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance pursuant to the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act. 2. The same applies to each corresponding item in the annexed sheet of calculation of damages (in principle, the period for calculation convenience shall be calculated on a monthly basis, but less than the last month and less than the last month shall be discarded). The current value calculation at the time of the accident shall be based on the discount method that deducts the intermediary interest according to the ratio of 5/12% per month. In addition, if the parties’ assertion, it is unreasonable to separately explain that the statistics and statistics were stated in the annexed sheet of calculation of damages: If the actual income and the victim’s income are recognized to have been based on the actual income at the time of the accident at the time of the accident, it is reasonable and objective to calculate the actual income at the time of the actual loss.

(see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 96Da36524, Dec. 6, 1996). After acquiring the qualification as an electrical engineer in 2007, the Deceased served in a company related to the boomment and cable line, electric charging, and electric charging work, and between January 1, 2016 and March 29, 2016, M Co., Ltd. and April 4, 2016.