1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The details of the decision are the school foundation that operates C University (hereinafter referred to as the "university of this case"), and B was newly appointed as a full-time lecturer at the University of this case on March 1, 2006, and then promoted to the assistant professor on April 1, 2008 and the associate professor on April 1, 2012, and was reappointed as associate professor on April 1, 2015.

(Period of Appointment: From April 1, 2015 to March 31, 2018). The instant university provided guidance on the expiration of the term of appointment to B on April 23, 2018, and B applied for review of reappointment.

On May 31, 2018, the teachers' personnel committee of the university of this case conducted the first deliberation on the reappointment of the year 2018.

The reference points for reappointment shall not be satisfied.

According to the revised Private School Act (amended by the relevant provisions that the rate of new students shall be increased in the evaluation score, and that evaluation related to donation solicitation activities, etc. shall not be reflected in the evaluation score), the standard points for reappointment were applied downward In addition, in December 2016, the Regulations on the Personnel Management of Teachers were amended in relation to the standards for reappointment, and the Personnel Committee of Teachers decided that the immediately preceding contract period was three years (from April 1, 2015 to March 31, 2018) for teachers, who had been a three-year term (the immediately preceding contract period).

Therefore, in relation to items (1) above, the teachers' personnel committee applied at least 54 points average to teachers whose total contract period was three years (from April 1, 2015 to March 31, 2018), and at least 63 points average to teachers whose immediately preceding contract period was one year.

2015 points 2016 points 2017 points 2017 points 2018 points 2018 points 56.8 non-permanent 5.8 points 5.8 below are as follows:

The evaluation score of the reappointment of our school is only reflected in the evaluation score of teachers, and the faculty evaluation committee knows that the evaluation score of teachers is finally determined through an objection for a certain period of time.