1. The Defendants are jointly and severally liable to the Plaintiff for KRW 41,00,000 and for KRW 2,000,000 among them, from December 27, 2013 to September 2015.

1. Basic facts

A. Defendant C (hereinafter only referred to as Defendant C) is a school foundation that establishes and operates the D University. Defendant B is a major in Chinese language and translation of the said University, and the principal is the principal in Chinese language and translation of the said University. The Plaintiff was an assistant professor with Chinese language and translation of the said University.

B. On February 20, 2013, the Plaintiff and the period from March 20, 2013 to February 28, 2014, the Defendant foundation entered into an employment contract with an assistant professor from March 20, 2013 to February 28, 2014; the position is an assistant professor, the affiliated associate professor, and the annual salary is KRW 24 million in Chinese language.

C. On October 31, 2013, the president of the above university (hereinafter only referred to as the president) notified the Plaintiff that “the application for deliberation on reappointment is subject to the expiration of the appointment period, and the application for deliberation on reappointment and the necessary documents therefor are shipped out,” according to the aforementioned notification, the Plaintiff submitted an application for deliberation on reappointment signed by the Plaintiff and Defendant B, a major supervisor, and a written protocol of education and research business. The president submitted the application for deliberation on reappointment, along with the written application for deliberation on reappointment and written protocol of education and research business submitted by the Plaintiff, and the president requested the deliberation of the said university teachers’ personnel committee (hereinafter referred to as the “personnel personnel committee”) to be reappointed to the Chairperson.

On December 4, 2013, the teachers’ personnel committee reported to the president on the result of the deliberation on the reappointment and re-contract teachers, stating that “the term of appointment for the plaintiff is not to be re-appointed.” On December 4, 2013, the president notified the president of the defendant corporation to the president of the board of directors, “the term of appointment for the plaintiff is not to be re-appointed.” On November 27, 2013, the Defendant corporation notified the Plaintiff of the refusal of re-appointing on December 26, 2013 following the board of directors.

(hereinafter referred to as such review or procedure of reappointment and refusal of reappointment shall be subject to the first review or disposition of refusal of reappointment, etc.

E. On January 13, 2014, the Plaintiff issued a disposition to refuse to be re-appointed to the Appeal Commission for Teachers.