logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2020.09.25 2019구합86839
교원소청심사위원회결정취소
Text

The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

Costs of lawsuit shall be borne by all the Plaintiff, including costs incurred by participation in the lawsuit.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On March 1, 1991, the Plaintiff was appointed as E and a full-time lecturer at D University operated by the Intervenor (hereinafter “instant University”), and was promoted as an associate professor on April 1, 1996, and as an associate professor on March 1, 2007, and was reappointed on March 1, 2013 until February 28, 2019.

B. On November 1, 2018, an intervenor notified the Plaintiff that his appointment period expires on February 28, 2019 and that he is subject to an application for examination of reappointment. The Plaintiff submitted an application for examination of reappointment to the Intervenor around that time.

C. On November 28, 2018, the teachers’ personnel committee of the instant university deliberated on whether to be reappointed to the Plaintiff, and decided on the conditional reappointment of the Plaintiff on December 24, 2018 (hereinafter “instant conditional reappointment”) on the following grounds: (a) the term of employment was not meeting the required points for research activities (300 points); (b) the Plaintiff was up to February 28, 2019; and (c) the president of the instant university notified the Plaintiff of the said conditional reappointment (hereinafter “instant conditional reappointment”) on December 24, 2018.

The Plaintiff submitted “F” on January 11, 2019 and “G” on January 22, 2019 with its research performance to the president of the instant university. However, the University Research Evaluation Committee did not recognize each of the above books as the Plaintiff’s research performance on the ground of failure to meet the requirements for plagiarism and teaching instruction on March 4, 2019.

Accordingly, on March 6, 2019, the teachers’ personnel committee of the instant university decided that the Plaintiff did not meet the requirements for conditional reappointment. On March 8, 2019, the president of the instant university may request the Plaintiff to vindicate and review the Plaintiff in accordance with Article 8 of the Regulations on the Appointment of Full-time Teachers Members, along with the research evaluation committee and the teachers’ personnel committee’ personnel committee’s resolution on March 8, 2019. If the Plaintiff did not request explanation and reexamination by March 25, 2019, the Plaintiff is reappointed to the Intervenor’s board of directors.

arrow