1. All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Defendants.

Purport of claim and appeal

(b).

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance (such as law, precedents, interpretation and application of legal principles, recognition of facts and facts requiring proof, determination of issues, etc.) is sufficiently reasonable as a result of determining issues in accordance with the appellate court’s methods and principles, laws, precedents, legal principles and rules of evidence based on the litigation materials and arguments submitted to the appellate court citing the court of first instance.

The reasoning for this Court concerning this case is as follows, and the reasoning for this Court is as stated in the part of the judgment of the first instance except for further determination as to the matters alleged as the grounds for appeal by the Defendants, as set forth in paragraph (2) and paragraph (3) below. As such, this Court cited this case’s summary as it is, pursuant to the main sentence of

2. (a) Part 4 of the judgment of the court of first instance, on the 4th page “A” and “A” generated from the 4th page “A” and “A”, respectively, shall be used as “A dispute resolution committee” and the same 4th page “A” (hereinafter referred to as “A”) shall be deleted.

(b) Part 4 of the judgment of the first instance court, the "One Bank" and "I Bank" generated from the 6th and below shall be used as "I Bank," and all "I Bank" shall be deleted. (c) Part 5 of the judgment of the first instance shall be "6,791,497, and less than 10 won," "6,791,497," and (d) Part 5 of the judgment of the first instance shall be "6,791,497, and less than 10 won." (d) Part 5 of the judgment of the first instance, Part 16 "Sajin 16" and "Sajin Tech 1" generated from the 5th judgment of the first instance shall be incorporated into "Sajin Dajin 15," and all "Sajin 1".

3. Additional determination on the grounds for appeal

A. The summary of the Defendants’ assertion is that the Defendant-based Lone Star Co., Ltd. did not have any economic issues from the debtor-based Lone Star Co., Ltd.

In order to secure the means of payment for the amount of goods unpaid at the request of the Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd. and to maintain the stable transaction in the future, Defendant A-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B