beta
Text
1. The Defendant’s KRW 90,558,116 as well as 5% per annum from August 1, 2013 to November 17, 2014 to the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. On March 1, 2011, the Defendant entered into a contract on the improvement of performance of the CCTV control devices for illegal parking and stopping under the said contract, setting the warranty period from March 10, 201 to April 29, 201, and setting the warranty period from June 11, 2011 to June 10, 201, and entered into a contract on the improvement of performance of the CCTV control devices for illegal parking and stopping under the said contract. The illegal parking and stopping vehicle monitoring system is installed in the area where the illegal parking and stopping control system within the jurisdiction of the Silung-si and the CCTV monitoring room in the Silung-si, and up to now, the illegal parking and stopping control work is conducted using the instant system.
(2) On January 10, 2012, the Plaintiff entered into a contract with the IMB on January 10, 2012 to transfer all rights to the reduction system of illegal parking and stopping vehicles developed by the IMB between the Defendant and the IMB.
MAB closed its business at the beginning of 2012, and the Defendant requested the Plaintiff to repair the instant system whenever there is no contractual relationship. The Plaintiff performed the maintenance and repair work of the instant system from January 2012 to July 2013. From July 2012 to July 2013, the service cost and equipment cost required for the maintenance and repair work of the instant system are KRW 90,558,116.
【Ground of recognition】 The fact that there is no dispute, A1, 2, 3, 4, 5-1, 5-2, 5-3, the purport of all pleadings
2. The assertion and judgment
A. According to the above facts of recognition as to the cause of claim, the Defendant, without any legal cause, obtained the Plaintiff’s benefits equivalent to the service costs and equipment costs incurred in performing the Plaintiff’s system maintenance work, and the Plaintiff suffered damages equivalent to the same amount. The Defendant, from July 2012 to July 2013, 2013, as well as KRW 90,558,116, which is equivalent to the equipment costs and the service costs incurred during the period from July 1, 2012 to July 2013, and thereafter, raised objection against the Plaintiff.