beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Purport of claim and appeal
The first instance court.
Reasons
1. The gist of the Plaintiff’s assertion is a citizen residing in Gwangjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, who is a child protection zone, and Seoul Gwangjin-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, C, etc., which is a prohibited towing area for parking, but at all times, pedestrians cannot walk properly due to the illegal stopping of a large number of parcels of vehicle, and is very complicated and dangerous.
Plaintiff
It also suffers serious damage as a pedestrian who passes through the above road, etc. every day.
Therefore, from March 2015 to September 2017, the Plaintiff requested several times to take measures to tow illegal parked vehicles from the Defendant’s “Seoul City 120 Dacol Center” operated by the Defendant. However, public officials belonging to “Seoul 120 Dacol Center” did not take any measures only when delivering it to the side of the Gwangjin-gu Office, and public officials belonging to the Gwangjin-gu Office’s traffic guidance and public officials belonging to the Gwangjin-gu Office did not take any measures to ensure that the vehicles illegally parked are not eradicated because they did not take thorough towing measures.
Accordingly, in order to eradicate illegal parking and stopping vehicles, the Plaintiff requested towing of the above vehicle at “Seoul Metropolitan City 120 Dacol Center” after photographing a photograph of the vehicle parked daily with private funds, and thereafter, the Plaintiff suffered a long-standing loss by requesting the towing of the vehicle again if there is a vehicle not yet towed thereafter. This resulted from the Defendant’s failure to properly treat the Plaintiff’s civil petition by carrying out exhibition administration as soon as he/she treats all civil petitions promptly if he/she requests a civil petition to the “Seoul Metropolitan City 120 Dacol Center.” As such, the Defendant, as seen above, was using a photograph of KRW 7,057,880, etc. used to request a long-term civil petition by the Plaintiff, 2,327,880, such as the purchase of equipment, knck, and issuance of certificate.