Defendant

A Imprisonment for one year, and each of the defendants B shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months.

Defendant 1 through 15 of seized evidence.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal history] On February 14, 2014, Defendant A was sentenced to a violation of the Game Industry Promotion Act at the Seoul Northern District Court (Seoul Northern District Court) and two years and six months of imprisonment for a crime of aiding and abetting, and four years of suspended execution. The judgment became final and conclusive on February 22, 2014.

[Criminal facts] Defendant A, which is an unregistered game product, committed an act of setting up a “sea-to-sea camping” to drink the operation of an illegal game room, and delegated Defendant B with the duties of daily payment, etc. during the game room management by citing Defendant B as the so-called “B president.”

1. The Defendants conspired to commit the crime in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government I, and operated a game room on February 17, 2012 to March 9, 2012, 2012, operated 40 games on the first underground level in the Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government I, and provided 40 games of “sea-to-sea-to-sea-to-sea” games, which were not classified as a class, for use by many unspecified customers, and exchanged the tangible and intangible results obtained using the said game machine in cash by giving cash at the rate of KRW 00,000 per point to the customers who completed the game.

2. The Defendants conspired to commit the crime in the Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan GovernmentJ, as above, and operated a game room on March 25, 2012 to March 26, 2012 on the first floor of the JJ in the Gangnam-gu, Seoul, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, operated 40 games, which were not classified as a class, provided 40 games for the use of an unspecified number of customers, and provided points to the customers who completed the game with cash in cash at the rate of KRW 00,000 per point.

As a result, the Defendants provided game water not classified into classes twice to customers, and exchanged tangible and intangible results obtained by using game water.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspect for the police against K or L;

1. Statement made by the police against M;

1. Police seizure records;

1. Response to an appraisal;

1. A previous conviction in judgment: