logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2015.06.19 2015고단402
야간건조물침입절도등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On February 2, 2015, the Defendant: (a) intruded into the back door of “D” located in Ma in Cheong-si, Government-si on February 2, 2015; and (b) stolen, in advance, three water pipes, two water pipes; and (c) one waste tank in the market value, owned by the victim E, located in the said in the said nives, by cutting off the said lives into the libera prepared in advance.

2. Violation of the Resident Registration Act.

A. On February 2, 2015, the Defendant: (a) arrested a flagrant offender on the street above D on the same day; (b) led to the police officer’s inquiry that asked the Defendant’s personal information when preparing a letter of arrest of a flagrant offender, and (c) unlawfully used another person’s resident registration number by speaking the Defendant’s resident registration number as if he/she was the Defendant’s resident registration number.

B. On February 2, 2015, at around 23:59, the Defendant was charged with the 1265 Government Police Station at the time of the Government-si in order to investigate into the night building intrusion and larceny that was arrested in flagrant offender. In the above criminal case, the Defendant asked the police officer’s personal information from the police officer’s inquiry, and used the Defendant’s F resident registration number as if the Defendant was the Defendant’s resident registration number, thereby denying another person’s resident registration number.

3. The Defendant: (a) on February 3, 2015, on the 01:20 on February 3, 2015; and (b) on the 2-B.

At the time of being investigated in the police station of the Speaker stated in paragraph (1) as a night intrusion theft, the accused was committed in F, and the accused was investigated, and without authority, the suspect interrogation protocol was forged by entering F’s name in the suspect interrogation protocol, and the police officer who is not aware of such fact was issued a forged suspect interrogation protocol as if it was duly formed.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's partial statement in court (the denial of intention to commit a crime under paragraph (1));

1. Legal statement of witness G;

1. Prosecutions;

arrow