logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2016.12.23 2016고단6588
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동상해)등
Text

Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months.

However, it is against the Defendants for two years from the date of the final judgment.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On June 15, 2016, the Defendants’ co-offendered Defendants came to be the starting point on the following grounds: (a) in relation to the work that Defendant A argued 3 days prior to the victim G (the age of 43) around 22:00, in the Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City’s “Fjum”, on the ground that Defendant A referred the victim to Defendant B and referred to as “I do not sat down, I do not sat down.”

Accordingly, Defendant A, by hand, pusheded the victim’s timber, was set off on the floor by cutting off the victim’s inner diameter, and Defendant B, by hand, dumpeded the victim’s bomb.

As a result, the Defendants jointly inflicted injury on the victim, such as a satisfying aggregate of satisfy to the right, which requires approximately seven weeks of treatment.

2. Defendant A

(a) No person who violates the Resident Registration Act shall unlawfully use another person's resident registration number;

On June 15, 2016, around 22:48, the Defendant arrested a flagrant offender from the H District District of the Incheon Southern Police Station, to verify his/her personal information, and used his/her resident registration number as his/her resident registration number as if he/she were his/her resident registration number.

B. The Defendant, at the time, place, and the arrest of a flagrant offender and demanded a police officer to sign a confirmation letter on the arrest of a flagrant offender, and carried out as if he was the J without authority for the purpose of gathering the personal information of the Defendant-friendly criminal, and signed the “J” column of the written confirmation document and submitted it to the said police officer after signing his seal to the “J” column.

Accordingly, the defendant has forged and exercised his signature by others for the purpose of exercising his right.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. A protocol of suspect examination of G police officers;

1. K. H.

arrow