logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원성남지원 2010.04.14 2009가합10283
임금
Text

1. The defendant shall pay to the plaintiffs the amount of money equivalent to the amount stated in the "personal fee" column of attached Table 1 and each of the above money.

Reasons

1. The following facts are either in dispute between the parties or acknowledged by considering the overall purport of the pleadings as a whole in each entry in Gap evidence 1-1, 2, 2-2-3, 3-7, 9-1 to 3.

The plaintiffs are those employed by the defendant from August 2006 to the present day, or those who retired from office after December 2008, who joined the Dranchising B viewing Trade Union under the C organization.

The Plaintiffs’ working conditions were determined by the collective agreement concluded between the above trade union and the B market and the guidelines enacted by the Ministry of Government Administration and Home Affairs. The collective agreement in 2005 and the collective agreement in 2007 limited the scope of the Plaintiffs’ ordinary wages to “basic pay, special work allowance, work encouragement allowance, household subsidy, fixed meal allowance,” and the Plaintiffs’ regular and uniform payment made by the Defendant. The Plaintiffs excluded the Plaintiffs from the scope of ordinary wages “regular pay, transportation subsidy, sanitation allowance, risk allowance, and fixed meal allowance,” but the Plaintiffs’ regular and uniform payment made it possible to exclude the Plaintiffs from the scope of ordinary wages (However, in the case of a fixed meal allowance from 2007 to 208, the Defendant was recognized to be the scope of ordinary wages. Accordingly, from August 2006 to November 208, the Defendant calculated the Plaintiffs according to the ordinary wages calculated in accordance with the aforementioned collective agreement and the collective agreement in 2007 to the Plaintiffs’ payment of the annual overtime allowance in attached Table 4.

2. Determination on a claim for additional payment of a holiday work allowance

A. The plaintiffs' claim for continuous service, additional charges, transportation subsidy, sanitation allowance, risk allowance, and the amount of salary (the amount paid in 2006) are included in the scope of ordinary wages under the Labor Standards Act.

arrow