logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2015.02.06 2014누6625
공무상요양등불승인처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The plaintiff was employed by the Korea Railroad Corporation on October 4, 1994 and was established by the Korea Railroad Corporation on January 1, 2005.

On August 11, 2004, while working as a vehicle manager of the Office of Railroad (Korea Railroad Corporation), the Plaintiff was injured by the traffic accident (hereinafter “instant accident”) while getting on and off a passenger car driven by the workplace B, which is a workplace guard around 18:10 on August 11, 2004.

The plaintiff filed an application for medical care for the injury or disease of this case due to the accident of this case with the defendant on June 28, 2005, but the defendant rejected it on June 28, 2005, and the judgment became final and conclusive upon the plaintiff's winning judgment (Seoul Administrative Court Decision 2006Guhap7058, Seoul High Court Decision 2006Nu15754) by filing a lawsuit.

On June 14, 2007, the Defendant approved the medical care on official duties (from August 11, 2004 to December 16, 2004) with respect to the injury or disease of this case which was approved on the basis of the above final judgment.

On July 25, 2007, the Plaintiff filed an application with the Defendant for approval of additional medical care and extension of the period (i.e., January 4, 2005 to January 25, 2005, July 18, 2005 to August 17, 2005), but the Defendant rendered a non-approval decision on August 14, 2007, and the Plaintiff filed a lawsuit (Seoul Administrative Court 2008Gudan4728) against this, but was withdrawn from the absence of both parties twice.

After that, on April 4, 2012, the Plaintiff filed an application for the approval of additional injury and extension of the period (from April 4, 2009 to November 26, 2010) with the Defendant on the ground that the post-sign escape certificate (hereinafter “the instant injury”) was created between No. 5-6 during the pertinent accident. However, on April 23, 2012, the instant injury and disease were attributable to the change of the running of the post-signing signboard, and thus, the instant injury and disease was approved.

arrow