logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2014.07.25 2012구단14708
공무상요양등불승인처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On October 4, 1994, the plaintiff was employed by the Korea Railroad Corporation while serving as a member of the Korea Railroad Corporation, and was treated as employed on January 1, 2005 after retirement from the Korea Railroad Corporation.

B. On August 11, 2004, while the Plaintiff was working as the vehicle manager of the Office of Railroad (Korea Railroad Corporation at present), the Plaintiff was injured by a traffic accident (hereinafter “instant accident”) due to the Plaintiff’s climatic salt, the climatic salt, the strike, and the stride of the two sides (hereinafter “the climatic disease”).

C. The Plaintiff filed an application with the Defendant for medical care on the above Gyeongbu District, Hybu District, and Hybu District due to the instant accident, but the Defendant rejected it on June 28, 2005, and the judgment became final and conclusive upon receiving a favorable judgment (Seoul Administrative Court Decision 2006Guhap7058 and Seoul High Court Decision 2006Nu15754) by filing a lawsuit against the Plaintiff.

The Defendant approved the injury and disease of this case according to the above judgment, and the Plaintiff provided medical care for the injury and disease of this case on official duty (from August 11, 2004 to December 16, 2004). D.

On July 25, 2007, the Plaintiff filed an application with the Defendant for approval of the extension of medical care, additional illness and extension of the period of time for official duties on the back-to-date premium No. 5-6 of the YYY between the Defendant and the Defendant on July 25, 2007. However, the Defendant rendered a non-approval decision on August 14, 2007, and the Plaintiff filed a lawsuit (Seoul Administrative Court Decision 2008Gudan4728), but the Plaintiff was dismissed on two occasions by absence of both parties.

E. After that, on April 4, 2012, the Plaintiff applied for the approval of additional medical care additional injury and injury to official duties on the ground that the escape certificate of the conical signboard No. 5-6 of the No. 5-6 (hereinafter “the instant injury”) occurred due to the instant accident, but the Defendant was due to the change of the running of the conical signboard on April 23, 2012.

arrow