logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 정읍지원 2016.11.29 2016고단55
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

An application for compensation by an applicant for compensation shall be dismissed.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2016 Highest 55"

1. When there was a shortage of living expenses, the Defendant had raised money through so-called “Internet fraud”.

On October 15, 2015, the Defendant, at the “O church” located N in the Jeoncheon-si, the Defendant, using the Defendant’s mobile phone in the Internet NN, posted a letter on the website bulletin board, selling high- and digital camera (the model name: Samsung N1000), and made a false statement to the victim P who contacted by telephone, stating that “The Defendant sold high- and digital camera at KRW 140,000,000,” and that “the Defendant would sell high- and digital camera at the price of Kamerra.”

However, in fact, since the above digital camera did not work normally due to damage to the price of the above digital camera, the defendant did not have the intent or ability to reduce the above camera to the victim even if he received 140,000 won from the victim.

Nevertheless, the defendant was transferred 140,000 won to a new bank account in the name of the defendant in the name of the victim at around 17:50 on the same day.

In addition, the Defendant received a total of KRW 1.2 million from the victims on five occasions, as shown in the attached Table 1, from around that time to November 21, 2015.

Accordingly, the defendant was provided property by deceiving the victims.

"2016 Highest 114"

2. On November 27, 2015, the Defendant made a false statement to the Defendant’s house located in Q Q Q from the Defendant’s office located in Jeoncheon-si, Q, to the effect that he would sell Internet NAVV in Q, and that he would deliver money to the victim R who contacted the Defendant to the account, and that he would transfer money to the account.

However, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to sell the Nowon-gu, even if he received money from the victim due to the lack of Nowon-gu.

Nevertheless, the defendant is under the name of the defendant for the same day from the victim.

arrow