The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (misunderstanding of the facts) is merely a false statement, i.e., a mistake of fact or a misunderstanding of the purport of questioning, and does not intentionally state a false statement, recognizing that it goes against memory.

2. Determination

A. The following circumstances, which are acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, i.e., the recording of the conversations between the defendant, E, D, and AW ( husband of D) on October 22, 2007, i.e., the recording of the criminal facts 1-A and 2-A, as indicated in the judgment of the court below, i.e., the statement of the conversation between the defendant, E, D, and D ( husband of D) on October 22, 2007 25,000 if the statement of the understanding of agriculture and forestry again is 4-50 million won, i.e., the condition of the agricultural and forest area, if

It is essential to deduct “Isson’s Madson’s Madson’s Madson’s name in an agricultural and forest area from the deduction of only the money now entered.

J. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. . L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L.

There is no special reason for the registration. "A special reason for the registration."

It is necessary to provide such a brupt, and to return the brupted area to the original condition of 25,000,000 agricultural and forest areas.

The Defendant’s statement is written “(Evidence No. 101)” (Evidence No. 101); ② The Defendant appeared as a witness in related civil cases and stated to the effect that he did not have made the above statement. However, the person who made the above statement as a result of appraisal of the recording file in which the above conversation is recorded is confirmed as the Defendant (Evidence No. 754 of the evidence record); ③ The Defendant’s statement to D on October 23, 2007, “agricultural and forest area will terminate the sales contract if necessary.”

Comprehensively taking into account the fact that the confirmation document stating “” was prepared, the Defendant entered into a sales contract with D to receive investment money, not the actual purchase of the land, and thus, it is unnecessary to transfer the ownership of the land and may terminate it at any time.

“The purport of “ shall be sufficiently recognized.”