The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal did not assault the victims.

Nevertheless, the judgment of the court below which found all of the facts charged of this case guilty is erroneous by misunderstanding facts and affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

2. The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the lower court, namely, victim D, at the court of the lower court and the investigative agency, and the victim D reached knife due to the Defendant’s desire and the finger.

“A consistent statement was made to the effect that “(39 pages of the trial record, 42 pages of the evidence record),” and F, at the court of the original instance and the investigative agency, the Defendant appeared to have observed the scene of assaulting the victim D as above.

The statement (58 pages of the trial record, 35 pages of the evidence record), ② The victim F used the court of the court below and the investigative agency, and “the defendant assaults D, and the other customers called the defendant at the restaurant.

The defendant reported that he will enter a restaurant again, and prevented the entrance of the main body as a person who was unable to have access to D.

As to who is the Defendant’s “Iskn”

“Sick,” and assaulted by the head, citing the fluor of steel materials, etc., as the head was “influored.”

“A consistent statement was made to the effect that “(56 pages, 35-36 pages, 35-36 of the trial records)” was consistent, and D, in the court of the original instance, witnessing the victim F in the course of assaulting the victim F.

In full view of the fact that a police officer, who received a report at the time of 112, confirmed that he was Blsheshes in the part of the victim F’s quota (Evidence 20 pages), etc., the Defendant could fully recognize the fact that he assaulted the victims as stated in the facts charged in the instant case.

Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition, since the defendant's appeal is without merit.