beta
Text
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
Reasons
1. The summary of the grounds of appeal Nos. D, G, and I’s statements are inconsistent with each other’s statements from the investigative agency to the court of the original trial, and even if each other’s statements are inconsistent, the court of the original instance judged credibility of the witness’s statements, and found the Defendant guilty of the facts charged, the court below erred by misapprehending the legal principles.
2. Comprehensively taking account of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly admitted and investigated by the lower court, the Defendant’s assertion of mistake of facts is rejected, since it is recognized that the Defendant had damaged the reputation of the victim by making a statement as stated in the facts charged in the instant case.
A. In relation to the crime of Paragraph (1) of the crime of this case, D stated in the police investigation that “I am flick E’s clothes taken by the victim from the victim’s house at the time, and the Defendant showed the victim’s cell phone pictures taken by the Defendant using his cell phone,” and stated in the court below that “I am flick, I am flick. I am am flick. I am am. I am flick” (30 pages of the evidence record) and that “I am flick in the court below that I am flick of the victim’s clothes and that
(142 pages of the trial record) In addition, I stated that at the court of original instance, the defendant made the above statement from D and E.
(127 pages). (b) The records of trial;
With regard to the crime of Paragraph 2 of the crime of this case, G revealed in the police investigation that “A defendant shows his/her clothes photographed with his/her cell phone to the author,” “A” and “I am saw his/her clothes photographed with his/her cell phone,” and stated that “I am fry, his/her chest.” (Evidence No. 38 pages of the evidence record) at the court of the court below, on February 2016, 2016, he/she made a statement about the Defendant’s chest, etc. at the outside stage of the F apartment complex only in the first place in the F apartment complex, the Defendant made a statement on February 3, 2016.
[Attachment].]