Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,500,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. Forging a private document;

A. On February 26, 2009, the Defendant, without being delegated by D for the purpose of exercising in JK Telecom C with the aim of exercising in JK Telecom, entered “D” and “E” into the customer information column for the new contract for the mobile telephone of the SK Telecom, and signed a letter of new contract in the name of D name of the applicant customer column with the signature of “D” and “E” on the resident registration number column.

B. On April 3, 2009, without being delegated by F for the purpose of exercising at the above place, the Defendant entered the customer information column of SK Telecom service in the customer information column of SK Telecom contract into the “F” and the “G” column with a verification color pen, and forged one copy of the new contract in the name of F in the name of the applicant customer column.

2. Exercising the relevant investigation document;

A. Defendant 1 exercised a document forged at the same date, time, and place as the foregoing paragraph 1(a) by submitting to an employee whose name is not known as if the document was duly formed.

B. The Defendant exercised one copy of the new contract forged at the same date, time, and place as above 1-B by submitting it to an employee whose name is not known as if the document was duly formed.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness D and F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a copy of a new contract for youth mobile phones (D) or a copy of a new contract for service;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 231 of the Criminal Act (the point of Article 231 of the Private Document), Articles 234 and 231 of the Criminal Act (the point of exercising the above investigation document) and the choice of fines for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Determination on the Defendant’s assertion under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. The defendant's assertion is in accordance with the request of D, who is his/her father and wife with respect to the provision of the first and second family facts constituting the crime in the judgment.